store | blogs | forums | twitter | facebook | wiki | mailing lists | downloads | support portal
Atomic Secure Linux
It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 10:50 am

» Feed - Atomicorp

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic Share/Bookmark  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: rule description changes to (null)
Unread postPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:08 am 
Offline
Forum Regular
Forum Regular

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 515
Location: United Kingdom
When I make any customisations/changes to rules/levels/action via GUI, the rule description changes to (null), ASL is right up to date and I have observed this behaviour the last couple of updates (before and after the .08 update). If I manually, remove entries from /etc/asl/rules the interface shows the rule description correctly again. Blocking never seems to occur either. Any ideas? Is this a bug or a local config issue on this system?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: block many checkmailpasswd attempts?
Unread postPosted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 11:13 am 
Offline
Forum Regular
Forum Regular

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:38 pm
Posts: 704
Location: Sweden
Kalimari wrote:
When I make any customisations/changes to rules/levels/action via GUI, the rule description changes to (null), ASL is right up to date and I have observed this behaviour the last couple of updates (before and after the .08 update). If I manually, remove entries from /etc/asl/rules the interface shows the rule description correctly again. Blocking never seems to occur either. Any ideas? Is this a bug or a local config issue on this system?


+1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: rule description changes to (null)
Unread postPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:23 pm 
Offline
Forum Regular
Forum Regular

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 515
Location: United Kingdom
This still happens. When ever a rule is modified via GUI it ends up being shown as (null) and the customisation takes no effect.

For example, tried to modify rule 3912 to ENABLE active response to multiple login failures. Is this expected behaviour if changing the active response?

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: rule description changes to (null)
Unread postPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 6:35 pm 
Offline
Long Time Forum Regular
Long Time Forum Regular

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 11:19 am
Posts: 1846
I had noticed the change to "null" which was confusing and annoying, but not that it had not taken effect. The little dropdown things for the rule don't "stick" to the mode/configuration that's actually set, but looking at the appropriate .conf file seems to indicate that what I've asked the gui to do does actually happen, at least in the limited things I've changed. I think.

This is with Centos 4 32-bit.

_________________
--------------------------------
<advert>
If you want to rent a UK-based VPS that comes with friendly advice and support from a fellow ART fan, please get in touch.
</advert>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: rule description changes to (null)
Unread postPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 10:34 am 
Offline
Forum Regular
Forum Regular

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 515
Location: United Kingdom
Thanks for input faris. Which conf files are you looking at to see changes?
Expect changing a rules active response rule from DISABLED to ENABLED to take effect?
This is with RHEL 5.7 64-bit/Plesk 9.5.4


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: rule description changes to (null)
Unread postPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:44 pm 
Offline
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Posts: 7429
Location: earth
So unfortunately the description field is not something that in ossec's current form, allows you to move across modifications happening outside of the rule file itself. What happens is that we create a duplicate rule that loads before the original based on some of the fields available to it. Its something planned, but cut due to lack of time


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: rule description changes to (null)
Unread postPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:19 am 
Offline
Forum Regular
Forum Regular

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 515
Location: United Kingdom
Hi, noticed some customised rule behaviour is inconsistent:

3910: Courier brute force (multiple failed logins from the same IP).
3912: Multiple failed logins, 6 failures in 60 seconds from the same IP.

Set active response on and level 10, originally thought were not working (as they showed as null and didn't trigger), in fact they are, just not every time. In particular rule 3912 will sometimes not trigger despite dozens of log-in failures per minute for many hours, other times it will. Can anyone think of a reason for this, the logging is almost identical, even same IP on occasions.

On the other hand 52502: Virus detected, configured to not send e-mail behaves correctly.

Thanks for any suggestions.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic Share/Bookmark  [ 7 posts ] 

» Feed - Atomicorp

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group